Austin start-ups: highly efficient or just cheap?

March 10, 2009

I have lived and worked in this community for 17 years, through recessions and the most incredible boom times. One thing remains constant – we in Austin tend to “cheap-out”  when seeking the best advice and talent.

Austin’s start-up community is blessed with amazing resources. I love it here: I can ideate a technology product, assemble a team, and launch a product without having to glance beyond Austin’s city limits. Try that in St. Louis or Des Moines. Our entrepreneurial Bootstrap ethos and innovative conferences like RISE demonstrate the power of our community to build new businesses and future employers.

Anyone who lives on billable hours in Austin will likely agree, however, that it’s hard to make a buck in this town.  I spoke with a marketing consultant recently who explained he doesn’t notice the recession because he’s always struggled with finding good work in Austin, even in boom times, and that “people just don’t want to pay for good help here.”

To be sure, I am conflicted. As an avowed bootstrapper I have benefited from our low-cost support structure. I have also felt the pain of many a goose chase from well-intentioned but relatively unsophisticated Austin companies. 

I would posit that our garage culture extends too far into company maturity and our tendency to seek out “free-miums” with consultants and advisers hurts the success rate of Austin companies. Why?

I have a few theories…

  1. Austin still trades on the tech boom myth that a cut-rate deal leads to windfall compensation at some future point. How many of you reading this (yes, me too) still hold millions in start-up paper? 
  2. The influence of famously stingy organizations on our business culture. Those of us who’ve lived on the receiving end of Dell contracts understand this. 
  3. The ratio of service providers to actual work is high. Many of us who love and choose to live in Austin trade a lucrative business environment for the privilege of living here. I recently heard one expert joke that in Austin you make money in  the “travel business” as in “traveling” to “business.”
  4. Many Austin executives tend to be overly-impressed with folks from big-name companies, colleges and markets. Sure we have great engineers and designers, but when it comes to hiring the best business experts we tend to look elsewhere. Truly a shame.
  5. When we have a critical problem, we do not eagerly seek out new expertise or service provides. We are still very much a do-it-yourself town.

I’m no big spender, but could this skimping reflect a lack of business savvy? Do we believe that tech companies in Silicon Valley and Alley scrimp and save when it comes to hiring the brightest bankers, lawyers, executives and advisers? Maybe now they must, but in my experience they have been too busy making money, launching products and grabbing market share to worry about negotiating hourly fees down another five bucks.

Since opportunity cost is difficult to measure we never know what we miss, and on we go, swimming in our pond, struggling against national competitors with stables of well-cared for experts, advisers and partners. 

My challenge for service providers: Don’t audition for work by doing free work, unless you are truly investing in a company and can afford the time. Estimate your marketable value  and stick with it.  If you don’t value your time, no one else will. Take pride in your expertise.

And for Austin companies still who never seem to make it to the next level? Pay experts what they’re worth. Leverage the best experts and focus on winning. And do it local – no need to look past the Great Hills Starbucks or 360Uno’s for the right person or firm. They will likely respond with more value than you ever  dreamed.

Let’s move the Austin technology community to our rightful place as influencers and innovators.

Entry Filed under: austin, business strategy, consulting, entrepreneurial, start-ups, venture. Tags: , , , , , .

4 Comments Add your own

  • 1. amandafinch  |  March 13, 2009 at 1:53 pm

    Yes, a big part of the problem is that we have so many consultants in Austin. Many are just starting out, trying to get referenceable or “marquee” accounts by doing work pro bono or dirt cheap. This may be a necessary evil for the individual consultant. Still, it has a commoditizing effect at best, and causes companies to “devalue” expert advice and services at worst.

    I agree that–as a result–”penny wise and pound foolish” companies can incur opportunity costs.

    May I highlight a particular point made here? It is very true that some Austin companies find it almost impossible to estimate (or even think in terms of) opportunities. Risk? Got it nailed. Cost? Ditto. But… Opportunity? Size of a potential market? Benefit of removing barriers to sales? Ask the company for their estimates and you may well get vague (or no) answers.

    All too often when a consultant provides that same company with answers to the opportunity questions, the immune system of the company simply rejects it. This is often the case with technology-centric startups, where the culture supports a “build it and the market will come” belief.

    Not all Austin startups fit this mold, but I do see it quite often.

  • 2. Jonathan Gilliam  |  March 13, 2009 at 3:36 pm

    Wow. Great thesis about the culture of he technical mindset of “build it they will come” being a culprit. Hadn’t thought of that at all. Until now I have been under the impression that was so 90’s, but when you think about it it’s still prevalent. thanks for the comment!

  • 3. Jonathan Gilliam  |  March 13, 2009 at 7:11 pm

    Also, I should mention that this post is meant to describe companies who have already built a real business and are skimping, even though they can afford to invest. It was not meant to apply to seed stage, bootstrapped companies. Bootstrappers are smart to barter services and trade leads and referrals in lieu of cash, as both sides can benefit from the relationship and grow together.

  • 4. cbesondy  |  March 23, 2009 at 12:50 pm

    Very interesting and disheartening to see in the Fast Company 50 most innovative organizations that only two were headquartered in the state of Texas. Two.

    Both were in Austin. SxSW and Whole Foods.

    I’ll let the readers decide if there is a correlation between Jonathan’s insightful post and this lack of innovation (or at least the lack of national visibility). Perhaps if more companies invested more wisely in marketing they would have caught the eye of Fast Company editors.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Twitter

Feeds

Tags

advertising alliances angel investing Business Development business strategy C-Level Sales collaboration company vision competitive intelligence conferences digital Enterprise Sales entrepreneurs funding interactive Jonathan Gilliam blog leadaership leadership management management tips Marketing marketing analytics marketing programs motivation Networking new account development online marketing partnering Sales sales 2.0 sales and networking Sales Articles sales management sales recruiting Sales Tips skills assessment start-ups Strategy techcrunch Technology trade show strategy venture venture capital web design web development

Meta

Blogroll

Feeds

sales 2.0